AMD Ryzen 7 250 vs Intel Celeron N4500
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
250 N/A
N4500 6
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
250 813
N4500 N/A
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
250 101
N4500 N/A
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
250 14458
N4500 709
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
250 1705
N4500 452
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
250 12048
N4500 801
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
46.6 images/sec
2.49 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
-
N/A
Base Frequency (P)
3.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Blender / Watt
N/A
1.11 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
27.1 PPW
N/A
Clang compilation
81.2 Klines/sec
7.93 Klines/sec
Codename
Zen 4 (Hawk Point)
Jasper Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the AMD Ryzen 7 250
- 276% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
AMD Ryzen 7 250
Intel Celeron N4500
Blender CPU
N/A
6
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
813
N/A
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
101
N/A
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
14458
709
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1705
452
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
12048
801
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2617
480
Integrated Graphics
81
16
Multi-Core Performance
42
2
NanoReview Final Score
64
17
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
25818
1818
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3794
1293
Power Efficiency
83
54
Single-Core Performance
73
18
iGPU FLOPS
4
0