AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8500G
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
385 N/A
8500G 158
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
385 1688
8500G 686
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
385 133
8500G 108
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
385 28887
8500G 11520
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
385 2150
8500G 1794
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
385 16648
8500G 11084
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
80.4 images/sec
52.9 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
-
3.3 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Blender / Watt
N/A
2.44 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
30.7 PPW
10.6 PPW
Clang compilation
131.9 Klines/sec
73.2 Klines/sec
Codename
Zen 5 (Strix Halo)
Zen 4 (Phoenix)
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
- 34% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G
Blender CPU
N/A
158
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1688
686
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
133
108
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
28887
11520
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2150
1794
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
16648
11084
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2870
2716
Integrated Graphics
99
N/A
Multi-Core Performance
66
33
NanoReview Final Score
78
58
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
32274
21497
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3913
3880
Power Efficiency
80
71
Single-Core Performance
84
76
iGPU FLOPS
11
1