Apple M2 Ultra vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
Ultra 501
6900HS 180
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Ultra 1918
6900HS N/A
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Ultra 126
6900HS N/A
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Ultra 28924
6900HS 14030
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Ultra 1735
6900HS 1552
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Ultra 21387
6900HS 9682
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
56.5 images/sec
47.6 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
2.4 GHz
N/A
Base Frequency (P)
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Blender / Watt
6.27 PPW
5.16 PPW
Bus Frequency
N/A
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
24 PPW
N/A
Clang compilation
226.4 Klines/sec
75.3 Klines/sec
Codename
Apple M2
Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Apple M2 Ultra
- 44% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Apple M2 Ultra
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
Blender CPU
501
180
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1918
N/A
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
126
N/A
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
28924
14030
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1735
1552
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
21387
9682
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2685
2034
Integrated Graphics
N/A
74
Multi-Core Performance
80
35
NanoReview Final Score
78
54
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
50787
23073
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4204
3231
Power Efficiency
76
68
Single-Core Performance
75
62
iGPU FLOPS
N/A
3