Apple M4 (10-Core) vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

📋 Review
Apple M4 (10-Core)

Apple M4 (10-Core)

📋 Review
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

âš¡ Performance

System and application performance

Blender CPU
(10-Core) 229
5900X 316
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
(10-Core) 982
5900X 1193
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
(10-Core) 172
5900X 95
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
(10-Core) 13471
5900X 20634
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
(10-Core) 2159
5900X 1568
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
(10-Core) 14818
5900X 12701

📊 Specifications

Technical specifications comparison

Background blur
69.8 images/sec
38.7 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
2.89 GHz
N/A
Base Frequency (P)
4.46 GHz
3.7 GHz
Blender / Watt
9.58 PPW
3.02 PPW
Bus Frequency
N/A
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
40.9 PPW
11.4 PPW
Clang compilation
120.2 Klines/sec
126 Klines/sec
Codename
Apple M4
Zen 3 (Vermeer)

💡 Key Differences

What are the key differences between the processors

Advantages of the Apple M4 (10-Core)

  • ✓ 27% better nanoreview final score performance

📋 Tests and Specifications

Detailed comparison table of test results

Metric
Apple M4 (10-Core)
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Blender CPU
229
316
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
982
1193
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
172
95
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
13471
20634
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2159
1568
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
14818
12701
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3777
2263
Integrated Graphics
84
N/A
Multi-Core Performance
43
53
NanoReview Final Score
76
60
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
23823
38959
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4531
3467
Power Efficiency
93
52
Single-Core Performance
96
65
iGPU FLOPS
4
N/A