Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Core i9 14900
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
N4500 6
14900 410
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
N4500 N/A
14900 1408
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
N4500 N/A
14900 129
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
N4500 709
14900 31070
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
N4500 452
14900 2212
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
N4500 801
14900 17953
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
2.49 images/sec
68.5 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
N/A
1.5 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
1.1 GHz
2.0 GHz
Blender / Watt
1.11 PPW
6.32 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
N/A
21.7 PPW
Clang compilation
7.93 Klines/sec
189.3 Klines/sec
Codename
Jasper Lake
Raptor Lake Refresh
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core i9 14900
- 365% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Celeron N4500
Intel Core i9 14900
Blender CPU
6
410
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
N/A
1408
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
N/A
129
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
709
31070
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
452
2212
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
801
17953
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
480
2835
Integrated Graphics
16
N/A
Multi-Core Performance
2
73
NanoReview Final Score
17
79
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
1818
45222
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
1293
4381
Power Efficiency
54
63
Single-Core Performance
18
86
iGPU FLOPS
0
0