Intel Core i5 13400F vs Apple M3 Ultra
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
13400F 200
Ultra 717
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
13400F 814
Ultra 2753
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
13400F 100
Ultra 133
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
13400F 15911
Ultra 41782
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
13400F 1744
Ultra 1989
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
13400F 11321
Ultra 28128
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
54.8 images/sec
63.2 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
1.8 GHz
2.75 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
2.5 GHz
4.05 GHz
Blender / Watt
3.09 PPW
5.13 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
N/A
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
12.5 PPW
19.7 PPW
Clang compilation
88.9 Klines/sec
319.2 Klines/sec
Codename
Raptor Lake
Apple M3
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Apple M3 Ultra
- 63% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core i5 13400F
Apple M3 Ultra
Blender CPU
200
717
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
814
2753
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
100
133
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
15911
41782
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1744
1989
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11321
28128
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2409
3247
Multi-Core Performance
40
100
NanoReview Final Score
57
93
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
25035
74152
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3639
5119
Power Efficiency
58
87
Single-Core Performance
71
88
iGPU FLOPS
N/A
0