Intel Core i7 1280P vs Intel Core i3 N305
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
1280P 171
N305 58
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1280P 619
N305 0
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
1280P 91
N305 0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
1280P 11666
N305 4411
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1280P 1651
N305 1018
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1280P 10823
N305 5277
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
47.9 images/sec
25 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
1.3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
1.8 GHz
N/A
Blender / Watt
6.12 PPW
3.88 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
22.1 PPW
-
Clang compilation
94.4 Klines/sec
41.7 Klines/sec
Codename
Alder Lake
Alder Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core i7 1280P
- 61% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core i7 1280P
Intel Core i3 N305
Blender CPU
171
58
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
619
0
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
91
0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
11666
4411
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1651
1018
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
10823
5277
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2325
1339
Integrated Graphics
48
30
Multi-Core Performance
34
14
NanoReview Final Score
53
33
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
20026
9599
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3308
2097
Power Efficiency
58
63
Single-Core Performance
67
40
iGPU FLOPS
2
0