Intel Core i9 13900F vs Intel Core i5 8250U
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
13900F 428
8250U 38
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
13900F 1601
8250U N/A
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
13900F 117
8250U N/A
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
13900F 35774
8250U 3091
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
13900F 2008
8250U 900
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
13900F 18411
8250U 3272
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
65.3 images/sec
20.5 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
1.5 GHz
N/A
Base Frequency (P)
2.0 GHz
1.6 GHz
Blender / Watt
6.59 PPW
2.56 PPW
Bus Bandwidth
N/A
4 GT/s
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
24.6 PPW
N/A
Clang compilation
175.5 Klines/sec
18.9 Klines/sec
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core i9 13900F
- 193% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core i9 13900F
Intel Core i5 8250U
Blender CPU
428
38
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1601
N/A
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
117
N/A
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
35774
3091
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2008
900
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
18411
3272
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2772
1117
Integrated Graphics
N/A
23
Multi-Core Performance
78
9
NanoReview Final Score
79
27
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
49125
5801
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4401
1879
Power Efficiency
58
47
Single-Core Performance
82
35
iGPU FLOPS
N/A
0