Intel Core i9 14900 vs Apple M3
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
14900 410
M3 160
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
14900 1408
M3 712
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
14900 129
M3 140
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
14900 31070
M3 10454
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
14900 2212
M3 1904
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
14900 17953
M3 11815
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
68.5 images/sec
50.2 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
1.5 GHz
2.75 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
2.0 GHz
4.05 GHz
Blender / Watt
6.32 PPW
8.02 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
N/A
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
21.7 PPW
35.6 PPW
Clang compilation
189.3 Klines/sec
94.7 Klines/sec
Codename
Raptor Lake Refresh
Apple M3
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core i9 14900
- 20% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core i9 14900
Apple M3
Blender CPU
410
160
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1408
712
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
129
140
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
31070
10454
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2212
1904
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17953
11815
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2835
3009
Integrated Graphics
N/A
81
Multi-Core Performance
73
33
NanoReview Final Score
79
66
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
45222
19133
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4381
4727
Power Efficiency
63
88
Single-Core Performance
86
84
iGPU FLOPS
0
4