Intel Core Ultra 5 228V vs Intel Core i3 N300
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
228V 0
N300 N/A
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
228V 539
N300 305
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
228V 105
N300 65
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
228V 9971
N300 4602
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
228V 1705
N300 1020
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
228V 10235
N300 4394
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
47 images/sec
19.9 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
2.1 GHz
0.8 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
2.1 GHz
-
Blender / Watt
-
N/A
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
14.6 PPW
43.6 PPW
Clang compilation
61.5 Klines/sec
32.3 Klines/sec
Codename
Lunar Lake
Alder Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
- 81% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
Intel Core i3 N300
Blender CPU
0
N/A
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
539
305
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
105
65
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
9971
4602
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1705
1020
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
10235
4394
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2555
1292
Integrated Graphics
72
30
Multi-Core Performance
32
14
NanoReview Final Score
58
32
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
17211
8292
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3830
1940
Power Efficiency
77
63
Single-Core Performance
72
39
iGPU FLOPS
3
0