Intel Core Ultra 5 245K vs Intel Core i9 13900F
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
245K 322
13900F 428
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
245K 1518
13900F 1601
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
245K 136
13900F 117
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
245K 25085
13900F 35774
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
245K 2118
13900F 2008
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
245K 17863
13900F 18411
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
86.2 images/sec
65.3 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
3.6 GHz
1.5 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
4.2 GHz
2.0 GHz
Blender / Watt
2.58 PPW
6.59 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
12.1 PPW
24.6 PPW
Clang compilation
144.3 Klines/sec
175.5 Klines/sec
Codename
Arrow Lake
Raptor Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core i9 13900F
- 4% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Intel Core i9 13900F
Blender CPU
322
428
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1518
1601
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
136
117
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
25085
35774
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2118
2008
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17863
18411
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2981
2772
Integrated Graphics
51
N/A
Multi-Core Performance
64
78
NanoReview Final Score
76
79
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
43420
49125
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4705
4401
Power Efficiency
73
58
Single-Core Performance
87
82
iGPU FLOPS
1
N/A