Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core i3 N305
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
155H 172
N305 58
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
155H 911
N305 0
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
155H 99
N305 0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
155H 15043
N305 4411
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
155H 1795
N305 1018
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
155H 12515
N305 5277
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
49.2 images/sec
25 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
0.9 GHz
1.8 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
1.4 GHz
N/A
Blender / Watt
2.65 PPW
3.88 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
14 PPW
-
Clang compilation
100.8 Klines/sec
41.7 Klines/sec
Codename
Meteor Lake
Alder Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
- 82% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Core i3 N305
Blender CPU
172
58
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
911
0
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
99
0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
15043
4411
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1795
1018
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
12515
5277
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2421
1339
Integrated Graphics
86
30
Multi-Core Performance
39
14
NanoReview Final Score
60
33
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
24746
9599
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3449
2097
Power Efficiency
66
63
Single-Core Performance
71
40
iGPU FLOPS
4
0