Intel Core Ultra 7 165H vs Intel Core i3 N305
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
165H 211
N305 58
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
165H 947
N305 0
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
165H 106
N305 0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
165H 14551
N305 4411
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
165H 1759
N305 1018
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
165H 12979
N305 5277
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
51.3 images/sec
25 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
0.9 GHz
1.8 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
1.4 GHz
N/A
Blender / Watt
7.57 PPW
3.88 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
33.8 PPW
-
Clang compilation
105.2 Klines/sec
41.7 Klines/sec
Codename
Meteor Lake
Alder Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
- 85% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Intel Core i3 N305
Blender CPU
211
58
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
947
0
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
106
0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
14551
4411
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1759
1018
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
12979
5277
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2465
1339
Integrated Graphics
86
30
Multi-Core Performance
41
14
NanoReview Final Score
61
33
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
25906
9599
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3495
2097
Power Efficiency
71
63
Single-Core Performance
71
40
iGPU FLOPS
4
0