Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Intel Core i3 13100F
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
255HX 391
13100F 122
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
255HX 1694
13100F 394
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
255HX 130
13100F 96
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
255HX 26622
13100F 8805
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
255HX 2101
13100F 1715
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
255HX 15924
13100F 8028
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
64.1 images/sec
41.6 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
1.8 GHz
N/A
Base Frequency (P)
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Blender / Watt
7.11 PPW
2.11 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
30.8 PPW
6.8 PPW
Clang compilation
149.8 Klines/sec
50.9 Klines/sec
Codename
Arrow Lake
Raptor Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
- 52% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
Intel Core i3 13100F
Blender CPU
391
122
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1694
394
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
130
96
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
26622
8805
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2101
1715
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
15924
8028
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2989
2399
Integrated Graphics
51
N/A
Multi-Core Performance
67
24
NanoReview Final Score
76
50
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
49937
14647
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4624
3601
Power Efficiency
77
58
Single-Core Performance
87
70
iGPU FLOPS
1
N/A