Intel Core Ultra 7 256V vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
256V 87
185H 200
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
256V 582
185H 987
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
256V 118
185H 107
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
256V 10579
185H 18420
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
256V 1888
185H 1809
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
256V 10735
185H 13613
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
50.8 images/sec
45.2 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
2.2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Blender / Watt
2.35 PPW
3.08 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
15.7 PPW
15.2 PPW
Clang compilation
67.7 Klines/sec
102.8 Klines/sec
Codename
Lunar Lake
Meteor Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- 5% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Blender CPU
87
200
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
582
987
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
118
107
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
10579
18420
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1888
1809
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
10735
13613
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2676
2446
Integrated Graphics
80
86
Multi-Core Performance
28
45
NanoReview Final Score
59
62
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
19586
29367
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4002
3691
Power Efficiency
77
66
Single-Core Performance
77
72
iGPU FLOPS
4
4