Intel Core Ultra 7 265H vs AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
265H 236
9950X3D 616
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
265H 1034
9950X3D 2332
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
265H 125
9950X3D 137
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
265H 19218
9950X3D 42377
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
265H 2012
9950X3D 2242
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
265H 16018
9950X3D 22548
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
66.5 images/sec
81.9 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
1.7 GHz
N/A
Base Frequency (P)
2.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Blender / Watt
8.44 PPW
3.63 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
36.9 PPW
13.7 PPW
Clang compilation
122.7 Klines/sec
241.4 Klines/sec
Codename
Arrow Lake
Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
- 34% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Blender CPU
236
616
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1034
2332
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
125
137
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
19218
42377
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2012
2242
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
16018
22548
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2895
3475
Integrated Graphics
87
28
Multi-Core Performance
51
96
NanoReview Final Score
71
95
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
34657
70181
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4432
4737
Power Efficiency
80
74
Single-Core Performance
84
95
iGPU FLOPS
4
0