Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 13500
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
285 0
13500 257
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
285 1508
13500 1145
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
285 133
13500 0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
285 33289
13500 21007
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
285 2180
13500 1876
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
285 20165
13500 12573
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
81.2 images/sec
58.6 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
1.9 GHz
1.8 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Blender / Watt
-
3.97 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
23.2 PPW
17.6 PPW
Clang compilation
221 Klines/sec
128.5 Klines/sec
Codename
Arrow Lake
Raptor Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285
- 33% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Intel Core i5 13500
Blender CPU
0
257
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1508
1145
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
133
0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
33289
21007
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2180
1876
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
20165
12573
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3134
2451
Integrated Graphics
N/A
31
Multi-Core Performance
80
49
NanoReview Final Score
84
63
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
0
31160
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
0
3863
Power Efficiency
76
58
Single-Core Performance
89
75
iGPU FLOPS
0
0