Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
285 0
125H 137
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
285 1508
125H 668
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
285 133
125H 100
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
285 33289
125H 12620
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
285 2180
125H 1655
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
285 20165
125H 10746
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
81.2 images/sec
42.4 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
1.9 GHz
0.7 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
2.5 GHz
1.2 GHz
Blender / Watt
-
4.9 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
23.2 PPW
23.9 PPW
Clang compilation
221 Klines/sec
78.8 Klines/sec
Codename
Arrow Lake
Meteor Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285
- 53% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Blender CPU
0
137
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1508
668
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
133
100
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
33289
12620
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2180
1655
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
20165
10746
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3134
2242
Integrated Graphics
N/A
79
Multi-Core Performance
80
33
NanoReview Final Score
84
55
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
0
20790
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
0
3373
Power Efficiency
76
71
Single-Core Performance
89
66
iGPU FLOPS
0
3