Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
285 0
265H 236
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
285 1508
265H 1034
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
285 133
265H 125
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
285 33289
265H 19218
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
285 2180
265H 2012
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
285 20165
265H 16018
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
81.2 images/sec
66.5 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
1.9 GHz
1.7 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Blender / Watt
-
8.44 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
23.2 PPW
36.9 PPW
Clang compilation
221 Klines/sec
122.7 Klines/sec
Codename
Arrow Lake
Arrow Lake
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285
- 18% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Blender CPU
0
236
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1508
1034
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
133
125
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
33289
19218
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2180
2012
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
20165
16018
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3134
2895
Integrated Graphics
N/A
87
Multi-Core Performance
80
51
NanoReview Final Score
84
71
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
0
34657
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
0
4432
Power Efficiency
76
80
Single-Core Performance
89
84
iGPU FLOPS
0
4