Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Intel Core i9 11980HK
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
285HX 521
11980HK 207
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
285HX 2240
11980HK 0
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
285HX 126
11980HK 0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
285HX 38963
11980HK 13977
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
285HX 2244
11980HK 1574
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
285HX 22274
11980HK 10540
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
90.1 images/sec
33.9 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
2.1 GHz
-
Base Frequency (P)
2.8 GHz
2.6-3.3 GHz
Blender / Watt
9.47 PPW
3.19 PPW
Bus Bandwidth
N/A
8 GT/s
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
40.7 PPW
-
Clang compilation
227 Klines/sec
86.4 Klines/sec
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
- 71% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
Intel Core i9 11980HK
Blender CPU
521
207
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
2240
0
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
126
0
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
38963
13977
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
2244
1574
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
22274
10540
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3129
2226
Integrated Graphics
51
30
Multi-Core Performance
91
37
NanoReview Final Score
87
51
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
59317
22298
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4648
3246
Power Efficiency
77
50
Single-Core Performance
91
64
iGPU FLOPS
2
0