Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs AMD Ryzen 5 230
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
288V 134
230 0
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
288V 545
230 660
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
288V 122
230 98
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
288V 10522
230 10603
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
288V 1878
230 1780
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
288V 11069
230 9214
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
49.8 images/sec
44.3 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
3.3 GHz
-
Base Frequency (P)
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Blender / Watt
3.63 PPW
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
14.7 PPW
22 PPW
Clang compilation
69 Klines/sec
65.2 Klines/sec
Codename
Lunar Lake
Zen 4 (Hawk Point)
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
- 5% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
AMD Ryzen 5 230
Blender CPU
134
0
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
545
660
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
122
98
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
10522
10603
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1878
1780
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11069
9214
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2864
2355
Integrated Graphics
81
65
Multi-Core Performance
31
32
NanoReview Final Score
61
58
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
19799
20186
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4330
3644
Power Efficiency
77
83
Single-Core Performance
80
71
iGPU FLOPS
4
2