Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs Intel Core i3 1220P
ā” Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
288V 134
1220P 84
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
288V 545
1220P 379
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
288V 122
1220P 91
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
288V 10522
1220P 7453
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
288V 1878
1220P 1525
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
288V 11069
1220P 6905
š Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
49.8 images/sec
28.5 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
3.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Base Frequency (P)
3.3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Blender / Watt
3.63 PPW
3.02 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
14.7 PPW
13.5 PPW
Clang compilation
69 Klines/sec
57.1 Klines/sec
Codename
Lunar Lake
Alder Lake
š” Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
- 36% better nanoreview final score performance
š Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Intel Core i3 1220P
Blender CPU
134
84
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
545
379
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
122
91
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
10522
7453
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1878
1525
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11069
6905
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2864
2105
Integrated Graphics
81
36
Multi-Core Performance
31
21
NanoReview Final Score
61
45
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
19799
14526
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4330
3352
Power Efficiency
77
58
Single-Core Performance
80
62
iGPU FLOPS
4
1