Intel Processor N200 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D
âš¡ Performance
System and application performance
Blender CPU
N200 0
7600X3D 186
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
N200 91
7600X3D 858
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
N200 45
7600X3D 108
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
N200 3010
7600X3D 13469
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
N200 930
7600X3D 1702
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
N200 2747
7600X3D 12393
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
Background blur
12.5 images/sec
58.9 images/sec
Base Frequency (E)
3.7 GHz
-
Base Frequency (P)
N/A
4.1 GHz
Blender / Watt
-
2.86 PPW
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
100 MHz
Cinebench 2024 / Watt
15.2 PPW
13.2 PPW
Clang compilation
13.4 Klines/sec
90.5 Klines/sec
Codename
Alder Lake
Zen 4 (Raphael)
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the processors
Advantages of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D
- 104% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Processor N200
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D
Blender CPU
0
186
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
91
858
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
45
108
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
3010
13469
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
930
1702
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
2747
12393
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
903
2662
Integrated Graphics
30
28
Multi-Core Performance
9
38
NanoReview Final Score
28
57
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
4725
25708
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
1784
3584
Power Efficiency
63
72
Single-Core Performance
33
72
iGPU FLOPS
0
0