Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core) vs GeForce RTX 4090
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
AI/ML
(16-core) N/A
4090 76
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
(16-core) 881
4090 615
Blender GPU
(16-core) 469
4090 11794
Cinebench GPU
(16-core) N/A
4090 33180
Energy Efficiency
(16-core) 86
4090 44
FLOPS (FP32)
(16-core) 5
4090 82
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
1080p High
N/A
255
1080p Ultra
N/A
219
1440p Ultra
N/A
174
4K Ultra
N/A
105
ALU 2
598.5 FPS
15073.4 FPS
API
Metal
OpenGL
Architecture
Apple M GPU
Ada Lovelace
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
1390.1 FPS
1617.6 FPS
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090
- 441% better gaming performance
- 187% better nanoreview final score performance
- 980% better steel nomad lite score performance
- 649% better gb6 compute score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)
GeForce RTX 4090
AI/ML
N/A
76.00
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
881.00
615.00
Blender GPU
469.00
11794.00
Cinebench GPU
N/A
33180.00
Energy Efficiency
86.00
44.00
FLOPS (FP32)
5.00
82.00
G3D Mark Score
N/A
38130.00
GB6 Compute Score
42227.00
316301.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
9287.00
59636.00
GB6 ML Quantized
8833.00
31670.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
8485.00
42962.00
Gaming
17.00
92.00
Memory Bandwidth
204.00
1010.00
NanoReview Final Score
31.00
89.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
3903.00
42167.00
Workstation
27.00
91.00