Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core) vs Intel Arc A380

📋 Review
Intel Arc A380

Intel Arc A380

🎮 Performance

Gaming and compute performance

AI/ML
(64-core) 25
A380 13
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
(64-core) 261
A380 47
Blender GPU
(64-core) 1622
A380 454
Cinebench GPU
(64-core) 3331
A380 N/A
Energy Efficiency
(64-core) 60
A380 71
FLOPS (FP32)
(64-core) 21
A380 4

📊 Specifications

Technical specifications comparison

1080p High
N/A
39
1080p Ultra
N/A
30
1440p Ultra
N/A
21
4K Ultra
N/A
11
ALU 2
2120.6 FPS
1103.3 FPS
API
Metal
OpenGL
Architecture
Apple M GPU
Generation 12.7
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
727.9 FPS
268.6 FPS

💡 Key Differences

What are the key differences between the GPUs

Advantages of the Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core)

  • ✓ 192% better gaming performance
  • ✓ 159% better nanoreview final score performance
  • ✓ 304% better steel nomad lite score performance
  • ✓ 167% better gb6 compute score performance

📋 Tests and Specifications

Detailed comparison table of test results

Metric
Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core)
Intel Arc A380
AI/ML
25.00
13.00
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
261.00
47.00
Blender GPU
1622.00
454.00
Cinebench GPU
3331.00
N/A
Energy Efficiency
60.00
71.00
FLOPS (FP32)
21.00
4.00
G3D Mark Score
N/A
6282.00
GB6 Compute Score
106397.00
39896.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
14103.00
6112.00
GB6 ML Quantized
13229.00
4218.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
13120.00
5656.00
Gaming
38.00
13.00
Memory Bandwidth
819.00
186.00
NanoReview Final Score
44.00
17.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
14103.00
3494.00
Workstation
50.00
21.00