Apple M2 GPU (8-core) vs Intel Arc 130T

📋 Review
Apple M2 GPU (8-core)

Apple M2 GPU (8-core)

📋 Review
Intel Arc 130T

Intel Arc 130T

🎮 Performance

Gaming and compute performance

Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
(8-core) 48
130T 38
Blender GPU
(8-core) 298
130T 558
Cinebench GPU
(8-core) 807
130T N/A
Energy Efficiency
(8-core) 91
130T 90
FLOPS (FP32)
(8-core) 2
130T 3
G3D Mark Score
(8-core) 0
130T 6254

📊 Specifications

Technical specifications comparison

1080p High
N/A
32
1080p Ultra
N/A
25
1440p Ultra
N/A
18
4K Ultra
N/A
9
ALU 2
404.2 FPS
N/A
API
Metal
OpenGL
Architecture
Apple M GPU
Xe+
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
296.7 FPS
N/A

💡 Key Differences

What are the key differences between the GPUs

Advantages of the Intel Arc 130T

  • ✓ 10% better gaming performance
  • ✓ 45% better steel nomad lite score performance
  • ✓ 22% better gb6 compute score performance

📋 Tests and Specifications

Detailed comparison table of test results

Metric
Apple M2 GPU (8-core)
Intel Arc 130T
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
48.00
38.00
Blender GPU
298.00
558.00
Cinebench GPU
807.00
N/A
Energy Efficiency
91.00
90.00
FLOPS (FP32)
2.00
3.00
G3D Mark Score
0.00
6254.00
GB6 Compute Score
29705.00
36282.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
6893.00
9964.00
GB6 ML Quantized
6515.00
5008.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
6206.00
7262.00
Gaming
10.00
11.00
Memory Bandwidth
102.00
N/A
NanoReview Final Score
27.00
26.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
2072.00
3003.00
Workstation
23.00
15.00