Apple M2 GPU (8-core) vs Radeon 890M
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
AI/ML
(8-core) N/A
890M 18
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
(8-core) 48
890M 42
Blender GPU
(8-core) 298
890M 342
Cinebench GPU
(8-core) 807
890M N/A
Energy Efficiency
(8-core) 91
890M 97
FLOPS (FP32)
(8-core) 2
890M 5
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
1080p High
N/A
39
1080p Ultra
N/A
29
1440p Ultra
N/A
20
4K Ultra
N/A
10
ALU 2
404.2 FPS
936.2 FPS
API
Metal
OpenGL
Architecture
Apple M GPU
RDNA 3+
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
296.7 FPS
197.7 FPS
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the Radeon 890M
- 20% better gaming performance
- 4% better nanoreview final score performance
- 55% better steel nomad lite score performance
- 45% better gb6 compute score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Apple M2 GPU (8-core)
Radeon 890M
AI/ML
N/A
18.00
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
48.00
42.00
Blender GPU
298.00
342.00
Cinebench GPU
807.00
N/A
Energy Efficiency
91.00
97.00
FLOPS (FP32)
2.00
5.00
G3D Mark Score
0.00
8186.00
GB6 Compute Score
29705.00
42932.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
6893.00
15157.00
GB6 ML Quantized
6515.00
7082.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
6206.00
9613.00
Gaming
10.00
12.00
Memory Bandwidth
102.00
N/A
NanoReview Final Score
27.00
28.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
2072.00
3205.00
Workstation
23.00
17.00