Apple M3 Pro GPU (18-core) vs Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core)
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
AI/ML
(18-core) 24
(64-core) 25
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
(18-core) 97
(64-core) 261
Blender GPU
(18-core) 1514
(64-core) 1622
Cinebench GPU
(18-core) 5528
(64-core) 3331
Energy Efficiency
(18-core) 91
(64-core) 60
FLOPS (FP32)
(18-core) 7
(64-core) 21
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
ALU 2
N/A
2120.6 FPS
API
Metal
Metal
Architecture
Apple M GPU
Apple M GPU
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
N/A
727.9 FPS
Backend
GPU
GPU
Background Blur
82.1 img/sec
157.3 img/sec
Base Clock
500 MHz
450 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1296 MHz
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core)
- 111% better gaming performance
- 33% better nanoreview final score performance
- 178% better steel nomad lite score performance
- 147% better gb6 compute score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Apple M3 Pro GPU (18-core)
Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core)
AI/ML
24.00
25.00
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
97.00
261.00
Blender GPU
1514.00
1622.00
Cinebench GPU
5528.00
3331.00
Energy Efficiency
91.00
60.00
FLOPS (FP32)
7.00
21.00
GB6 Compute Score
43099.00
106397.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
13606.00
14103.00
GB6 ML Quantized
12673.00
13229.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
11804.00
13120.00
Gaming
18.00
38.00
Memory Bandwidth
153.00
819.00
NanoReview Final Score
33.00
44.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
5078.00
14103.00
Workstation
27.00
50.00