Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core) vs GeForce RTX 2070
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
AI/ML
(80-core) 41
2070 28
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
(80-core) 375
2070 100
Blender GPU
(80-core) 7340
2070 2216
Cinebench GPU
(80-core) 19448
2070 5899
Energy Efficiency
(80-core) 62
2070 28
FLOPS (FP32)
(80-core) 0
2070 7
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
1080p High
N/A
99
1080p Ultra
N/A
80
1440p Ultra
N/A
58
4K Ultra
N/A
31
ALU 2
2765.4 FPS
2485.9 FPS
API
Metal
OpenGL
Architecture
Apple M GPU
Turing
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
831.5 FPS
538.5 FPS
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)
- 76% better gaming performance
- 77% better nanoreview final score performance
- 103% better steel nomad lite score performance
- 51% better gb6 compute score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)
GeForce RTX 2070
AI/ML
41.00
28.00
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
375.00
100.00
Blender GPU
7340.00
2216.00
Cinebench GPU
19448.00
5899.00
Energy Efficiency
62.00
28.00
FLOPS (FP32)
0.00
7.00
G3D Mark Score
N/A
16078.00
GB6 Compute Score
147719.00
97923.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
23530.00
20355.00
GB6 ML Quantized
21706.00
8999.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
21356.00
12633.00
Gaming
51.00
29.00
Memory Bandwidth
819.00
448.00
NanoReview Final Score
55.00
31.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
17182.00
8478.00
Workstation
61.00
37.00