GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
AI/ML
1650 13
(4-Cores) N/A
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
1650 47
(4-Cores) N/A
Blender GPU
1650 451
(4-Cores) N/A
Energy Efficiency
1650 58
(4-Cores) 95
FLOPS (FP32)
1650 3
(4-Cores) 1
G3D Mark Score
1650 7871
(4-Cores) N/A
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
1080p High
41
N/A
1080p Ultra
32
N/A
1440p Ultra
22
N/A
4K Ultra
11
N/A
ALU 2
1021.5 FPS
N/A
API
OpenGL
OpenCL
Architecture
Turing
Xe LPG
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
262.3 FPS
N/A
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
- 33% better gaming performance
- 93% better nanoreview final score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
GeForce GTX 1650
Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
AI/ML
13.00
N/A
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
47.00
N/A
Blender GPU
451.00
N/A
Energy Efficiency
58.00
95.00
FLOPS (FP32)
3.00
1.00
G3D Mark Score
7871.00
N/A
GB6 Compute Score
39481.00
16321.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
5940.00
N/A
GB6 ML Quantized
5581.00
N/A
GB6 ML Single Precision
7569.00
N/A
Gaming
12.00
16.00
Memory Bandwidth
128.00
N/A
NanoReview Final Score
15.00
29.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
3412.00
N/A
Workstation
20.00
10.00