GeForce RTX 4080 vs Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core)
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
AI/ML
4080 66
(16-core) 33
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
4080 320
(16-core) N/A
Blender GPU
4080 8764
(16-core) 2347
Cinebench GPU
4080 30078
(16-core) 7768
Energy Efficiency
4080 44
(16-core) 94
FLOPS (FP32)
4080 48
(16-core) 7
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
1080p High
219
N/A
1080p Ultra
186
N/A
1440p Ultra
147
N/A
4K Ultra
88
N/A
ALU 2
9330.7 FPS
N/A
API
OpenGL
OpenCL
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Apple M GPU
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
1476.2 FPS
N/A
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4080
- 267% better gaming performance
- 97% better nanoreview final score performance
- 348% better steel nomad lite score performance
- 257% better gb6 compute score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
GeForce RTX 4080
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core)
AI/ML
66.00
33.00
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
320.00
N/A
Blender GPU
8764.00
2347.00
Cinebench GPU
30078.00
7768.00
Energy Efficiency
44.00
94.00
FLOPS (FP32)
48.00
7.00
G3D Mark Score
34463.00
N/A
GB6 Compute Score
217712.00
61008.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
53331.00
18809.00
GB6 ML Quantized
28104.00
17506.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
36799.00
16605.00
Gaming
77.00
21.00
Memory Bandwidth
716.00
273.00
NanoReview Final Score
73.00
37.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
30172.00
6739.00
Workstation
71.00
32.00