Intel Arc 130T vs Apple M2 Max GPU (38-core)
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
130T 38
(38-core) 178
Blender GPU
130T 558
(38-core) 1765
Cinebench GPU
130T N/A
(38-core) 5533
Energy Efficiency
130T 90
(38-core) N/A
FLOPS (FP32)
130T 3
(38-core) 13
G3D Mark Score
130T 6254
(38-core) N/A
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
1080p High
32
N/A
1080p Ultra
25
N/A
1440p Ultra
18
N/A
4K Ultra
9
N/A
ALU 2
N/A
1475.7 FPS
API
OpenGL
Metal
Architecture
Xe+
Apple M GPU
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
N/A
968.4 FPS
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the Apple M2 Max GPU (38-core)
- 179% better steel nomad lite score performance
- 140% better gb6 compute score performance
- 368% better aztec ruins high tier 4k (fps) performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Arc 130T
Apple M2 Max GPU (38-core)
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
38.00
178.00
Blender GPU
558.00
1765.00
Cinebench GPU
N/A
5533.00
Energy Efficiency
90.00
N/A
FLOPS (FP32)
3.00
13.00
G3D Mark Score
6254.00
N/A
GB6 Compute Score
36282.00
86936.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
9964.00
16456.00
GB6 ML Quantized
5008.00
15418.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
7262.00
15005.00
Gaming
11.00
N/A
Memory Bandwidth
N/A
409.00
NanoReview Final Score
26.00
N/A
Steel Nomad Lite Score
3003.00
8393.00
Workstation
15.00
N/A