Intel Arc 140T vs Apple M1 GPU (8-core)
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
140T 47
(8-core) N/A
Blender GPU
140T 707
(8-core) 256
Cinebench GPU
140T N/A
(8-core) 510
Energy Efficiency
140T 90
(8-core) 89
FLOPS (FP32)
140T 4
(8-core) 2
G3D Mark Score
140T 6686
(8-core) 0
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
1080p High
35
N/A
1080p Ultra
27
N/A
1440p Ultra
19
N/A
4K Ultra
10
N/A
ALU 2
1138.1 FPS
N/A
API
OpenGL
OpenCL
Architecture
Xe+
Apple M GPU
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
268.9 FPS
N/A
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the Intel Arc 140T
- 50% better gaming performance
- 8% better nanoreview final score performance
- 78% better steel nomad lite score performance
- 104% better gb6 compute score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Intel Arc 140T
Apple M1 GPU (8-core)
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
47.00
N/A
Blender GPU
707.00
256.00
Cinebench GPU
N/A
510.00
Energy Efficiency
90.00
89.00
FLOPS (FP32)
4.00
2.00
G3D Mark Score
6686.00
0.00
GB6 Compute Score
42502.00
20842.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
12046.00
5418.00
GB6 ML Quantized
5815.00
4395.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
8764.00
3284.00
Gaming
12.00
8.00
Memory Bandwidth
N/A
68.00
NanoReview Final Score
27.00
25.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
3329.00
1869.00
Workstation
17.00
21.00