Intel Arc A750 vs Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core)

🎮 Performance

Gaming and compute performance

AI/ML

A750 27

(64-core) 25

Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)

A750 137

(64-core) 261

Blender GPU

A750 1924

(64-core) 1622

Cinebench GPU

A750 0

(64-core) 3331

Energy Efficiency

A750 44

(64-core) 60

FLOPS (FP32)

A750 17

(64-core) 21

📊 Specifications

Technical specifications comparison

1080p High

98

N/A

1080p Ultra

80

N/A

1440p Ultra

59

N/A

4K Ultra

32

N/A

ALU 2

3065.6 FPS

2120.6 FPS

API

OpenGL

Metal

Architecture

Generation 12.7

Apple M GPU

Aztec Ruins Normal Tier

732.4 FPS

727.9 FPS

💡 Key Differences

What are the key differences between the GPUs

Advantages of the Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core)

✓ 23% better gaming performance
✓ 33% better nanoreview final score performance
✓ 30% better steel nomad lite score performance
✓ 7% better gb6 compute score performance

📋 Tests and Specifications

Detailed comparison table of test results

Metric

Intel Arc A750

Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core)

AI/ML

27.00

25.00

Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)

137.00

261.00

Blender GPU

1924.00

1622.00

Cinebench GPU

0.00

3331.00

Energy Efficiency

44.00

60.00

FLOPS (FP32)

17.00

21.00

G3D Mark Score

12572.00

N/A

GB6 Compute Score

99280.00

106397.00

GB6 ML Half Precision

12796.00

14103.00

GB6 ML Quantized

9086.00

13229.00

GB6 ML Single Precision

12178.00

13120.00

Gaming

31.00

38.00

Memory Bandwidth

512.00

819.00

NanoReview Final Score

33.00

44.00

Steel Nomad Lite Score

10867.00