Nvidia RTX 3000 Laptop (Ada) vs Apple M1 GPU (8-core)
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
AI/ML
(Ada) 32
(8-core) N/A
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
(Ada) 0
(8-core) N/A
Blender GPU
(Ada) 2853
(8-core) 256
Cinebench GPU
(Ada) 11020
(8-core) 510
Energy Efficiency
(Ada) 56
(8-core) 89
FLOPS (FP32)
(Ada) 10
(8-core) 2
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
ALU 2
-
N/A
API
-
OpenCL
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Apple M GPU
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
-
N/A
Backend
DirectML
CPU
Background Blur
196.1 img/sec
38.3 img/sec
Base Clock
-
450 MHz
Boost Clock
1165-2160 MHz (configurable)
1278 MHz
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the Nvidia RTX 3000 Laptop (Ada)
- 475% better gaming performance
- 84% better nanoreview final score performance
- 474% better gb6 compute score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Nvidia RTX 3000 Laptop (Ada)
Apple M1 GPU (8-core)
AI/ML
32.00
N/A
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
0.00
N/A
Blender GPU
2853.00
256.00
Cinebench GPU
11020.00
510.00
Energy Efficiency
56.00
89.00
FLOPS (FP32)
10.00
2.00
G3D Mark Score
15846.00
0.00
GB6 Compute Score
119612.00
20842.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
28903.00
5418.00
GB6 ML Quantized
13159.00
4395.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
17574.00
3284.00
Gaming
46.00
8.00
Memory Bandwidth
256.00
68.00
NanoReview Final Score
46.00
25.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
N/A
1869.00
Workstation
47.00
21.00