Nvidia RTX 4500 Ada vs Apple M2 GPU (8-core)

📋 Review
Nvidia RTX 4500 Ada

Nvidia RTX 4500 Ada

📋 Review
Apple M2 GPU (8-core)

Apple M2 GPU (8-core)

🎮 Performance

Gaming and compute performance

AI/ML
Ada 52
(8-core) N/A
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
Ada 0
(8-core) 48
Blender GPU
Ada 5526
(8-core) 298
Cinebench GPU
Ada 19967
(8-core) 807
Energy Efficiency
Ada 46
(8-core) 91
FLOPS (FP32)
Ada 39
(8-core) 2

📊 Specifications

Technical specifications comparison

1080p High
180
N/A
1080p Ultra
151
N/A
1440p Ultra
118
N/A
4K Ultra
69
N/A
ALU 2
-
404.2 FPS
API
-
Metal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Apple M GPU
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
-
296.7 FPS

💡 Key Differences

What are the key differences between the GPUs

Advantages of the Nvidia RTX 4500 Ada

  • ✓ 510% better gaming performance
  • ✓ 130% better nanoreview final score performance
  • ✓ 941% better steel nomad lite score performance
  • ✓ 596% better gb6 compute score performance

📋 Tests and Specifications

Detailed comparison table of test results

Metric
Nvidia RTX 4500 Ada
Apple M2 GPU (8-core)
AI/ML
52.00
N/A
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
0.00
48.00
Blender GPU
5526.00
298.00
Cinebench GPU
19967.00
807.00
Energy Efficiency
46.00
91.00
FLOPS (FP32)
39.00
2.00
G3D Mark Score
27797.00
0.00
GB6 Compute Score
206673.00
29705.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
40553.00
6893.00
GB6 ML Quantized
20133.00
6515.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
26396.00
6206.00
Gaming
61.00
10.00
Memory Bandwidth
432.00
102.00
NanoReview Final Score
62.00
27.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
21566.00
2072.00
Workstation
68.00
23.00