Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada vs Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)

📋 Review
Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada

Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada

🎮 Performance

Gaming and compute performance

AI/ML
Ada 54
(16-core) N/A
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
Ada 0
(16-core) 881
Blender GPU
Ada 7655
(16-core) 469
Cinebench GPU
Ada 0
(16-core) N/A
Energy Efficiency
Ada 45
(16-core) 86
FLOPS (FP32)
Ada 65
(16-core) 5

📊 Specifications

Technical specifications comparison

1080p High
184
N/A
1080p Ultra
156
N/A
1440p Ultra
121
N/A
4K Ultra
71
N/A
ALU 2
-
598.5 FPS
API
-
Metal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Apple M GPU
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
-
1390.1 FPS

💡 Key Differences

What are the key differences between the GPUs

Advantages of the Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada

  • ✓ 312% better gaming performance
  • ✓ 132% better nanoreview final score performance
  • ✓ 628% better steel nomad lite score performance
  • ✓ 516% better gb6 compute score performance

📋 Tests and Specifications

Detailed comparison table of test results

Metric
Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada
Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)
AI/ML
54.00
N/A
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
0.00
881.00
Blender GPU
7655.00
469.00
Cinebench GPU
0.00
N/A
Energy Efficiency
45.00
86.00
FLOPS (FP32)
65.00
5.00
G3D Mark Score
30025.00
N/A
GB6 Compute Score
260099.00
42227.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
36753.00
9287.00
GB6 ML Quantized
19649.00
8833.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
24715.00
8485.00
Gaming
70.00
17.00
Memory Bandwidth
576.00
204.00
NanoReview Final Score
72.00
31.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
28416.00
3903.00
Workstation
82.00
27.00