Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada vs Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core)
🎮 Performance
Gaming and compute performance
AI/ML
Ada 75
(32-core) 39
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
Ada 314
(32-core) 0
Blender GPU
Ada 11153
(32-core) 4396
Cinebench GPU
Ada 32515
(32-core) 0
Energy Efficiency
Ada 44
(32-core) 87
FLOPS (FP32)
Ada 91
(32-core) 14
📊 Specifications
Technical specifications comparison
1080p High
217
N/A
1080p Ultra
185
N/A
1440p Ultra
148
N/A
4K Ultra
88
N/A
ALU 2
10509.2 FPS
-
API
OpenGL
-
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Apple M GPU
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
593.9 FPS
-
💡 Key Differences
What are the key differences between the GPUs
Advantages of the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada
- 153% better gaming performance
- 87% better nanoreview final score performance
- 197% better steel nomad lite score performance
- 287% better gb6 compute score performance
📋 Tests and Specifications
Detailed comparison table of test results
Metric
Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada
Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core)
AI/ML
75.00
39.00
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
314.00
0.00
Blender GPU
11153.00
4396.00
Cinebench GPU
32515.00
0.00
Energy Efficiency
44.00
87.00
FLOPS (FP32)
91.00
14.00
G3D Mark Score
28429.00
N/A
GB6 Compute Score
389848.00
100725.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
53469.00
22005.00
GB6 ML Quantized
27850.00
20273.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
37270.00
19695.00
Gaming
81.00
32.00
Memory Bandwidth
960.00
409.00
NanoReview Final Score
84.00
45.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
33417.00
11262.00
Workstation
94.00
43.00