Radeon 840M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

📋 Review
Radeon 840M

Radeon 840M

📋 Review
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

🎮 Performance

Gaming and compute performance

AI/ML
840M 9
SUPER 14
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
840M 25
SUPER 55
Blender GPU
840M 125
SUPER 565
Cinebench GPU
840M N/A
SUPER 0
Energy Efficiency
840M 86
SUPER 50
FLOPS (FP32)
840M 3
SUPER 4

📊 Specifications

Technical specifications comparison

1080p High
18
56
1080p Ultra
14
43
1440p Ultra
9
30
4K Ultra
-
15
ALU 2
635.4 FPS
1419.9 FPS
API
OpenGL
OpenGL
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Turing
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier
139.4 FPS
305.2 FPS

💡 Key Differences

What are the key differences between the GPUs

Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

  • ✓ 114% better gaming performance
  • ✓ 237% better steel nomad lite score performance
  • ✓ 329% better gb6 compute score performance
  • ✓ 120% better aztec ruins high tier 4k (fps) performance

📋 Tests and Specifications

Detailed comparison table of test results

Metric
Radeon 840M
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AI/ML
9.00
14.00
Aztec Ruins High Tier 4K (FPS)
25.00
55.00
Blender GPU
125.00
565.00
Cinebench GPU
N/A
0.00
Energy Efficiency
86.00
50.00
FLOPS (FP32)
3.00
4.00
G3D Mark Score
0.00
10188.00
GB6 Compute Score
13390.00
57455.00
GB6 ML Half Precision
6067.00
7319.00
GB6 ML Quantized
3946.00
6132.00
GB6 ML Single Precision
4884.00
8531.00
Gaming
7.00
15.00
Memory Bandwidth
N/A
192.00
NanoReview Final Score
21.00
19.00
Steel Nomad Lite Score
1302.00
4387.00
Workstation
9.00
25.00